menu
×

Taxonomy

Collection 14515 is Hebeloma cavipes.

Description

  • arrow_drop_downarrow_drop_upCollecting details

    Collection 14515 was collected by E. Ludwig (1549II) on 21st October 1988 in GERMANY . No ectomycorrhizal plants were recorded.

    The surrounding habitat was described as not recorded.

  • arrow_drop_downarrow_drop_upMacroscopic description

    Cortina present: no.

    Pileus: not recorded diameter; shape not recorded; margin characters not recorded; viscosity tacky when moist; spotting not recorded; hygrophanous not recorded; colour variation two-colour; with colour at centre yellowish brown; and colour at margin pale cream; with remains of universal veil not recorded.

    Lamellae: analysis not yet complete.

    Stipe: analysis not yet complete.

    Context: analysis not yet complete.

    Spore deposit colour: analysis not yet complete.

    Exsiccata: analysis not yet complete.

  • arrow_drop_downarrow_drop_upMicroscopic description

    Spores: shape amygdaloid; colour through microscope not recorded; guttulate not recorded; papillate not recorded; Spore Code: O3; P1; P2; D2.

    Basidia: analysis not yet complete.

    Cheilocystidia: main shape clavate-lageniform or clavate-ventricose; special features septa; Cheilocystidia Ratios: A/M = not recorded; A/B = not recorded; B/M = not recorded.

    Pleurocystidia: no.

    Ixocutis: analysis not yet complete.

    Caulocystidia: analysis not yet complete.

    Spore(min) 5%-95% (max)meanmedianS.D.
    Length (µm)(10.2) 10.5–11.911.211.30.490
    Width (µm)(5.4) 5.7–6.5 (6.6)6.16.10.260
    Q(1.62) 1.68–1.97 (2.10)1.851.870.1
  • arrow_drop_downarrow_drop_upTemperature calculation
    Max tempMin tempPrecipitation
    Annualised average (1988)--- °C--- °C--- mm
    Collection month (10/1988)--- °C--- °C--- mm
    Max month (1988)--- °C--- °C--- mm

Compare this collection to its species

This section compares data for this collection against its true species and also against the most likely species as determined by our identifier. More often than not these will be the same species, but where this is not the case, the data may be used to help explain why the identifier got it wrong.

Image gallery

Detailed statistics

Spore measurementsMy valueSpecies mean valuePosition
Count 49.0 55.35 67th/89
Average length 11.2 11.82 83rd–90th/109
Average width 6.1 6.07 49th–59th/109
Standard deviation of length 0.49 0.72 76th/88
Standard deviation of width 0.26 0.32 66th–70th/88
Median length 11.3 11.85 65th–70th/88
Median width 6.1 6.09 44th–50th/89
Minimum length 10.2 10.30 61st–64th/108
Minimum width 5.4 5.40 52nd–61st/107
Low length 10.5 10.83 70th–77th/108
Low width 5.7 5.64 39th–50th/107
High length 11.9 12.87 95th–98th/108
High width 6.5 6.55 51st–75th/107
Max length 11.9 13.45 102nd–103rd/108
Max width 6.6 6.80 66th–75th/107
Spore featureValueCommonalities
Ornamentation O3 94% of collections
Perispore loosening P1; P2 73% of collections; 48% of collections
Dextrinoidity D2 78% of collections