Taxonomy
Collection 1000125 (held at herbarium JE) is Hebeloma pumilum. It is the holotype of heterotypic synonym Hebeloma birrus var. herrmanniae (Gröger) Gminder (2010).Description
- arrow_drop_downarrow_drop_upCollecting details
Collection 1000125 was collected by not recorded, det: F. Gröger on 9th October 1982 in between "Hohe Sonne" and Wilhelmstal near Eisenach, Thuringia, GERMANY (approx. 50.93°N, 10.32°E, altitude approximately 300 m above sea level - Google maps). No ectomycorrhizal plants were recorded.
The surrounding habitat was described as mixed woodland, corresponding to the IUCN habitat We map from the collector's description of the habitat to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)'s definition using a standardised set of rules. Please see this page for a full list of IUCN habitats. 1.4: Forest – Temperate.
According to the GPS data the collection was in the Western European broadleaf forests WWF ecoregion The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) have divided the world into 867 terrestrial ecoregions. The ecoregion here is estimated by mapping from the GPS coordinates of the collection using data made available by Dinerstein et al (2017). Use this webtool to explore the ecoregions visually or see a full list of current ecoregions on Wikipedia. (biome: Temperate Broadleaf & Mixed Forests) and Koppen climate code Dfb (Cold, no dry season, warm summer).
- clearclearMacroscopic description- analysis not yet complete
- clearclearMicroscopic description- analysis not yet complete
- arrow_drop_downarrow_drop_upTemperature calculation
Max temp Min temp Precipitation Annualised average (1982) 12.83 °C 3.71 °C 56.62 mm Collection month (10/1982) 12.31 °C 5.37 °C 89.73 mm Max month (1982) 23.87 °C 12.73 °C 92.34 mm
- arrow_drop_downarrow_drop_upAnalyse this collection
Compare this collection to its species
This section compares data for this collection against its true species and also against the most likely species as determined by our identifier. More often than not these will be the same species, but where this is not the case, the data may be used to help explain why the identifier got it wrong.Image gallery
Detailed statistics
| Spore measurements | My value | Species mean value | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count | Not recorded | 74.82 | Not recorded |
| Average length | Not recorded | 8.59 | Not recorded |
| Average width | Not recorded | 5.25 | Not recorded |
| Standard deviation of length | Not recorded | 0.57 | Not recorded |
| Standard deviation of width | Not recorded | 0.27 | Not recorded |
| Median length | Not recorded | 8.59 | Not recorded |
| Median width | Not recorded | 5.28 | Not recorded |
| Minimum length | Not recorded | 7.17 | Not recorded |
| Minimum width | Not recorded | 4.55 | Not recorded |
| Low length | Not recorded | 7.67 | Not recorded |
| Low width | Not recorded | 4.81 | Not recorded |
| High length | Not recorded | 9.40 | Not recorded |
| High width | Not recorded | 5.65 | Not recorded |
| Max length | Not recorded | 9.76 | Not recorded |
| Max width | Not recorded | 5.85 | Not recorded |
| Spore feature | Value | Commonalities |
|---|---|---|
| Ornamentation | ||
| Perispore loosening | ||
| Dextrinoidity |