Taxonomy
Collection 1000592 (herbarium acc. no. PUN 277) is Hebeloma nanum. It is the holotype of heterotypic synonym Hebeloma sordidum var. microsporum Saini & Atri (1985).Description
- arrow_drop_downarrow_drop_upCollecting details
Collection 1000592 was collected by N.S. Atri (NSA23) on 28th August 1979 in Summer Hill, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, INDIA (approx. 31.1146°N, 77.1399°E, altitude approximately 1985 m above sea level - Google maps). The ectomycorrhizal family Pinaceae (genus Cedrus) was present.
The surrounding habitat was described as montane, subtropical woodland with a substrate of soil and litter, corresponding to the IUCN habitat We map from the collector's description of the habitat to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)'s definition using a standardised set of rules. Please see this page for a full list of IUCN habitats. 1.9: Forest – Subtropical/tropical moist montane.
According to the GPS data the collection was in the Western Himalayan broadleaf forests WWF ecoregion The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) have divided the world into 867 terrestrial ecoregions. The ecoregion here is estimated by mapping from the GPS coordinates of the collection using data made available by Dinerstein et al (2017). Use this webtool to explore the ecoregions visually or see a full list of current ecoregions on Wikipedia. (biome: Temperate Broadleaf & Mixed Forests) and Koppen climate code Cwa (Temperate, dry winter, hot summer).
- clearclearMacroscopic description- analysis not yet complete
- clearclearMicroscopic description- analysis not yet complete
- arrow_drop_downarrow_drop_upTemperature calculation
Max temp Min temp Precipitation Annualised average (1979) 20.55 °C 12.49 °C 103.95 mm Collection month (8/1979) 24.21 °C 17.63 °C 175.78 mm Max month (1979) 28.31 °C 19.12 °C 334.82 mm
- arrow_drop_downarrow_drop_upAnalyse this collection
Compare this collection to its species
This section compares data for this collection against its true species and also against the most likely species as determined by our identifier. More often than not these will be the same species, but where this is not the case, the data may be used to help explain why the identifier got it wrong.Image gallery
Detailed statistics
| Spore measurements | My value | Species mean value | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count | Not recorded | 72.00 | Not recorded |
| Average length | Not recorded | 8.99 | Not recorded |
| Average width | Not recorded | 4.79 | Not recorded |
| Standard deviation of length | Not recorded | 0.52 | Not recorded |
| Standard deviation of width | Not recorded | 0.23 | Not recorded |
| Median length | Not recorded | 9.01 | Not recorded |
| Median width | Not recorded | 4.81 | Not recorded |
| Minimum length | Not recorded | 7.73 | Not recorded |
| Minimum width | Not recorded | 4.25 | Not recorded |
| Low length | Not recorded | 8.17 | Not recorded |
| Low width | Not recorded | 4.45 | Not recorded |
| High length | Not recorded | 9.82 | Not recorded |
| High width | Not recorded | 5.17 | Not recorded |
| Max length | Not recorded | 10.32 | Not recorded |
| Max width | Not recorded | 5.33 | Not recorded |
| Spore feature | Value | Commonalities |
|---|---|---|
| Ornamentation | ||
| Perispore loosening | ||
| Dextrinoidity |